 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the present moment, Intel is roughly 6 months ahead of AMD in terms of die size. Earlier this year Intel made the migration from a 90nm to a 65nm design and enjoyed phenomenal success from their decision. Intel has been turning up the heat on AMD since the release of their Core 2 processors and has forced AMD to aggressively try to catch up.
AMD, which currently holds a 20% market share of the computer processor market, has today announced their “Brisbane” 65nm processors. Hoping to increase their marketshare to 30% by the end of 2008, AMD has launched 4 “Brisbane” core processors.
| Model |
Core
Frequency |
L2 Cache |
TDP |
Pricing |
| 5000+ |
2.6 GHz |
2x512KB |
65W |
$301 |
| 4800+ |
2.5 GHz |
2x512KB |
65W |
$271 |
|
4400+ |
2.3 GHz |
2x512KB |
65W |
$214 |
|
4000+ |
2.1 GHz |
2x512KB |
65W |
$169 |
The hardest task for AMD will be stay caught up with Intel technology. Intel, which is a much larger company, currently spends around 5 times as much as AMD does on its design and manufacturing. Intel has already promised 45nm chips due to be debut in 2007 whereas AMD has kept a vow of silence regarding their own 45nm chip release date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |